top of page

NEWS

Editorials and Press Releases

Search

Updated: Dec 13, 2025


In 2024, Sarain won a Canadian Screen Award for Best Host or Interviewer, News or Information for work in Wookey Films' one0hour documentary, Indigiqueer.
In 2024, Sarain won a Canadian Screen Award for Best Host or Interviewer, News or Information for work in Wookey Films' one0hour documentary, Indigiqueer.

EDITORIAL-  By Johnny Hawk


If you're a "neechi" it be hard not to notice Influencer, Activist, Filmmaker and Public Figure, Sarain Carson-Fox taking up space in our social media feed the past two weeks where voices online have been digging roots on her family tree including individuals from the very same families and communities she lays claim to. I'm not going to play genealogist and add my two cents in the matter but want to share my interactions I had with her family in my attempt at a career in media where the socio-economic dynamics I've experienced play a significant role in regards to "Trick-Stars" and "Pretendians."


In the fall of 2005, while completing the joint FNTI–Humber College Print and Broadcast Journalism Program, I interned at Rogers Television in Barrie. I worked on the evening news and an Indigenous Culture and Arts show called NISH. During this placement, I worked with Shannon Sokolsky, the assistant producer for NISH and the hosts; Raven Kanatakta and Shoshona Kish members of the musical group Digging Roots. Shoshona Kish is also Shannon Sokolsky’s older sister.


As a second year journalism student I thought NISH would be perfect opportunity thart would allow me to gain experience and a credit as an associate producer. Shannon and I were the same age and although she wasn’t in a college journalism diploma program she was in a paid placement through an Indigenous Organization in Barrie, that her sister was also connected with.


Despite having prior experience working in other production environments, I found myself consistently under-utilized. Rather than being assigned tasks that matched my training and skill set, I was relegated to fetching coffees for the hosts, interviewees, carrying the heavy equipment, and performing tasks that did not reflect the level of education and experience I brought to the internship. Even when I contributed ideas, research support, and interview questions, my work was not acknowledged in the production credits. I didn't even get an opportunity to be a camera operator. I was made to feel like a "dumb tonto rez-indian"only useful as a grunt.


One particular shoot involved visiting Spirit Magazine in Wasauksing First Nation. During that assignment before we left the station in a Rogers vehicle, Shannon introduced me to her younger sister Sarain. Shannon told me Sarain was tagging along to take some professional photos of her to the publishers of SPIRIT for them to consider for a cover in their upcoming issue. Shannon and Sarain’s, older sister Shoshona, the host of NISH was on a previous cover with her husband Raven for SPIRIT. The tagalong was successful as Sarain managed to be featured on the cover of this National magazine and for such a risque' pose even for being seventeen at the time. For me I felt out of place to people who were supposed to be Anishinabek. I felt I was intruding in a circle of close friends which felt very much bourgeoise. That moment, combined with the broader dynamics I witnessed, contributed to a growing realization that in many Indigenous entertainment, media, arts spaces, access to opportunity often appeared shaped less by merit and more by networks, social positioning, and personal connections. 


Yes people are talented and skilled but just like Band Office and Rez Politics, that "n" word that rhymes with "pessimism" seems to always play a role with our people of who seem to always get all the opportunities.


This experience was discouraging and disillusioning. I encountered the same kinds of cliques, gatekeeping, and nepotism that I associated with how things ran like at home. These patterns—“it’s who you know,” proximity to influential circles, and social favouritism—seemed to influence opportunities, visibility, and career pathways also within the Indigenous arts, media, and entertainment.

Knowing I should've informed my Program Coordinators at FNTI and the folks at Rogers to how I felt, despite this and feeling like I'd be looked down upon by Sarain and her Sister for causing an issue I quit the internship placement. I felt I was just a "rez indian" and lacky among what I felt were Indigenous elitists. I did graduate and received my diploma yet this experience was a huge factor of not wanting to progress in any professional industry. This is why I choose to remain within the grassroots. Unfortunately I found that the very same dynamics are at play within our grassroots circles.


I'm sharing this experience as an example of what is felt by many Indigenous people—especially grassroots workers, community-based storytellers, and those without family ties in the industry that face barriers within our own institutions and creative and cultural spaces. These challenges influence whose voices are amplified, whose careers grow, and who feels welcome or pushed out. 


In relation to having my experience participating as a professional in "the real world" I feel we are shifting much of our culture to replicate this dominant mainstream society which is based on competition and the individual. This is very reflective in grants, funding, whose struggles are supported over others and whose voices are more prominent. Our culture which teaches us to elevate each other is now centred on the individual and competition for opportunities.


The efforts of Canada's Truth and Reconciliation initiative merged with government and other industries mandates of diversity, equity and inclusion has provided a tsunami of funding and opportunities where just being Indigenous has become a career, profitable and a huge industry for those that know how to work these systems.


Our healing, culture and even resistance has become and industry. This combined with the explosion of how social media influences everything we do in society where we are seeing issues of narcissistic behaviours corrupting our cultural spaces that advocate humility. Because we want to see ourselves represented in mainstream institutions, we ourselves become celebrity obsessed and are adopting mainstream values of a very exploitative, materialistic, individualistic society and where many want to live like and be seen as celebrities we idolize. This is appealing for the "Pretendian." The "Trickstars" however are our own People using cultural identity and other positions of privilege to fool others for opportunities to engage in their own selfish needs and are at most times predators and toxic narcissists.


Fashion designer Lauryn Cook says she wants to know why her models have yet to receive payment for working at an Indigenous fashion show held in Regina earlier this fall. Models from around the Prairies participated in the FashioNATIVE runway show at the DoubleTree hotel and conference centre in Regina, held Oct. 10 to 12.
Fashion designer Lauryn Cook says she wants to know why her models have yet to receive payment for working at an Indigenous fashion show held in Regina earlier this fall. Models from around the Prairies participated in the FashioNATIVE runway show at the DoubleTree hotel and conference centre in Regina, held Oct. 10 to 12.

Today, the Indigenous entertainment Industry and activism often navigate a complicated landscape where red carpets, social branding, and public personas coexist with teachings about humility, community responsibility, and reciprocity. It is important that we continue to examine how these dynamics affect our movements.


Are we only replicating institutions of the colonizers; indigenizing, or “red-washing” the very same hierarchal, misogynist, exploitive, institutions we claim to be against and are not ready to really resist? Are we only downloading and assimilating into Mainstream Culture which is contradictory to much of our values and what we claim to resist?


Resistance Movements are now Incorporated, the Revolution is Monopolized, Resistance is Fashionable. The Seven Grandfather Teachings themselves even now have now become Award Show Events in our communities. We denounce misogyny and male dominant culture of our oppressor but continue to champion our hero's in Hip-Hop who made careers off of misogyny, exploiting women, promoting brown on brown violence and gang culture, which is American Culture, Culture of the Colonizer. We applaud those who made it in beauty pagents, pedowood and the just-us system. We fool ourselves that "making it" and seeing ourselves represented and reflected in such institutions of the dominant war mongering eurocentric male society is progress.


I encourage we reflect on how we create space for all Indigenous voices—especially those who are not part of elite circles—and how we ensure that our institutions, creative industries, and advocacy networks remain grounded in integrity, accountability, and respect for all our people.


These “pretendians” and even our own Peoples have becomes very skilled by using our own teachings to deflect their toxic behaviours which can be seen in some of these rebuttals from such Peoples being questioned. Community members have described situations where cultural teachings, healing-language, and trauma-informed rhetoric were invoked in ways that shut down legitimate concerns, deflected accountability, or reframed valid critique as “violence” or “lateral violence.” Such dynamics can cause real harm, especially when those raising concerns are met with dismissal, pathologization, or moral framing rather than open dialogue.


It is important to acknowledge that the misuse of cultural teachings—whether intentional or not—can create an unhealthy power imbalance. When community-based language is woven together with therapeutic jargon, status, social capital, or institutional recognition, it can be used to silence, invalidate, or intimidate those with less access to platforms. This is especially true for Indigenous women and gender-diverse people whose experiences and voices are already made vulnerable by colonial structures.


These issues point to a larger conversation our communities must continue to have about:


  • Accountability for those in positions of influence, regardless of lineage, status, or professional role.

  • The responsible use of cultural knowledge, ensuring teachings are not weaponized or used to deflect criticism.

  • Upholding ethical and community-based standards in public-facing roles within the arts, media, and advocacy sectors.

  • Creating safer pathways for community members to raise concerns without fear of retaliation, character attacks, or spiritualized blame.

  • Challenging elitism and ensuring representation does not become concentrated among small social or professional networks.


It is ironic but in the tradition of the long forgotten art of “backwards medicine” we can learn a lot on how to be more of our authentic selves from “Pretendians.” These Pretendians are holding up a mirror on our communities and show us what we’ve allowed to enter in our communities and hearts and what we’ve become.  


In 2020 in an interview with APTN, actress Rosanne Supernault spoke on the toxicity that exists in the Indigenous Entertainment World in relation to rejecting the sexual advancements of Ian Campeau formerly of A Tribe Called Rez. 


Supernault said Campeau “made me feel guilty for not having sex with him. I felt scared, I felt like if I didn’t have sex with him it was going to affect my career.”


“ I felt alienated and at the time this is the hottest Indigenous music group on the planet, and I felt like a loser.


“I do feel like in a lot of ways it affected my career because I just started to feel more and more alienated not just from him but by other people in those circles.” “I know a lot of other people were responsible for slandering me and for edging me out and ruining my reputation and spreading lies about me,” she said in an interview.


“Fame, it goes to people’s heads. It’s the illusion of power. And I think that a lot of our people are getting lost in it,” she told APTN News.


We have adopted much of our colonizers institutions, arts, culture and even psychology.

Western Psychology has also infiltrated our teachings and corrupted some of our own forms of psychology which were developed over generations and which were in place to help protect ourselves and our people from inviting in dark energies, behaviours and dark spirits into our communities, hearts and minds. A type of example of this is how we adopted “political correctness.” We’ve adopted this mainstream ideology in recent years and become so obsessed with not offending anyone that this is one main factor in how “pretendians” have come to be an issue. We've made it a protocol out of being kind and respectful to not be offensive in making sure who we allow in our community.


Many of our Nations shared a common society, the contrary peoples. These people are said to be those who struggled with what western society would call “learning disabilities” and where they did not do what they were told, struggled with adapting to social norms and following instruction. Elder’s referred them as “thunderbeings” and came up with a way to solve this issue and gave them purpose. These type of peoples were allowed to offend. In Anishinabe Society they we called the Windigokaan, they were “fakes”, pretending to be Windigo, to chase away real Windigo’s and mock such behaviour so we wouldn't become possessed with excess and over consumption like these cannibals.


Nowadays most of our Peoples forgotten this society and these relatives and shunned for the medicine they share which can be offensive as they help to mock the many things we've accepted that are throwing us of balance.


Jesuits, Freesmasons have first infiltrated our Medicine Societies to influence our teachings. Our so called Warrior Societies nowadays also have been compromised and infiltrated and are being directed by energies that are not our own. Now the last remaining protectors are forgotten and demonized because their medicine if considered inappropriate or offensive for the important role they play because at times by those cultural gatekeepers, they are chased away and leave our communities to be taken over by such dark spirits and where we are becoming something we are not.


Thomas King a celebrated author, recently was discovered to not have any Indigenous lineage. He was considered an academic and and leading voice that represented our people. He was a celebrity, a gatekeeper of indigenous voices enjoying platforms of privilege. Sarain Carson Fox is someone that can be seen also as a influencer, gatekeeper and someone who is always in the spotlight, taking up space where other Indigenous Womens voices are not as prominent and who are just as taleneted and deserving. Sarain's mentor Michelle Latimer was ousted a pretendian shortly after they won an award for Best Documentary Award Program for RISE at the Canadian Screen Awards in 2018.


RISE which premiered at the 2017 Sundance Film Festival was a series widely recognized for its powerful coverage of Indigenous resistance movements. In one of the episodes that stood out for me, Sarain was heavily critical on Savage Family, a radical hip-hop group that spoke hards truths and promoted Warrior Culture. Sarain's voice in criticizing the group and her own questionable lived experience and where she is seen by Canada as an amplified voice of Indigenous Peoples only helped to pacify authentic voices that exists. Thomas King and his platform for years was considered a voice as well, these people take space where they become gatekeepers and the go to people for our own communities and settler society and shape our reality. They in turn are a pacification of our voices and realities and seen as safe "indians" for settlers to use and celebrate whose own backgrounds are in question if not out ousted as not "indigenous" and reflective of real communities and struggles.


There are even our own people who are profiting from opportunities to be seen as the settler friendly well behaved "Indian." They are operating government and NGO funded culture camps under the guise of sovereignty and resistance which in turn pacify authentic resistance camps, voices and movements. These individuals have become also a type of celebrity and cultural gatekeeper. The point I am sharing again the socio-economic factors I experience where such dynamics play a significant role to the very existence of "Trick-Stars" and "Pretendians. They see the opportunities which only play to watering down who we really are as we become downloads of mainstream culture. And because our People are obsessed with Celebrity they become mesmerized by such individuals.


Maybe we can learn from these "Pretendians" and "Trick Stars" who are only just a reflection of who’ve we become and what we allow into our community and lodges.


It is said Nanaboozho and his Nookmiis left the People long ago as the People started to only see him as a Trickster and a Fool stopped calling on for him and began to listen to new Hero’s and accepted new ways of being. 













 


 
 
 

by Johnny Hawk


Many of our grassroots peoples are echoing talking points of prominent Indigenous activists and academics regarding the Framework Agreement on First Nations Lands Management. Such voices of influence have amped up concerns that reserves are being turned into “municipal-type” bodies which is causing such grassroots to misinterpret that as bands under becoming fee simple lands and under provincial jurisdiction through the FNLMA regime. 


Many of our People and the so-called Canadian citizen have been deceptively educated on the legal history of Provinces and land. I break down the complexities of land management statutes using Canada’s own laws which is not my opinion nor a misunderstanding but share clear and simple facts in the statutes provided. I encourage everyone not to take my word but research for yourself these statutes. 


BANDS ARE ALREADY MUNICIPALITIES

Does the First Nations Lands Management Act turn a “band” into a municipality? The answer is no, however this matter is more complex then to just say no. All provinces and territories have their own enactment for a municipality which defines what a “municipality” is and the legal definition in those acts are a geographical area where the inhabitants are incorporated and have an elected council; both are a body corporate.” 


The definition of a “band” and or “reserve” under the Indian Act is also a geographical area whose inhabitants are incorporated and have an elected council whereby both are a body corporate. An “Indian Band” although is lands specifically for Indians and is under federal jurisdiction is still synonymous to the legal definition of a municipality.


A municipality and an Indian Band both act as local authorities for their residents to provide local services; manage land use and community planning; have governing councils; interact with higher levels of government and are juridical persons, corporations. Bands under the Indian Act are already municipalities aka an area of incorporated bodies of persons that have an elected council where both are the body corporate.  


THE PROVINCIAL LAWS THAT ALREADY APPLY TO RESERVES

Provincial traffic laws; Environmental Protection; Health and Safety Rules; Labour Standards (with exceptions) and Provincial Court Systems.


INDIGENOUS LANDS UNDER PROVINCIAL JURISDICTION

The Peace and Friendship and Upper Canada Treaties made with the Crown and our Nations opened up our Territories for our allies the British to establish their colonies of Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, Upper and Lower Canada and later the Numbered Treaties that allowed for the later provinces. 


Many of these Treaties were improper cessions of land involving fraud on part of the Crown and inadequate compensation and Treaty violations up to present day. The majority of these Traditional Lands are under Provincial Jurisdiction.    


According to a 2024-2025 Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Canada report there is a total of more than 1,100 unresolved claims or land-title issues (specific + comprehensive + litigation + special).


Indigenous Nations have to spend hundred of millions and years in court and prove section 35 tests if they want to file concerns about their Traditional Territories that the Province occupies. The Provinces have jurisdiction over our Traditional Territories and issue permits to multinational corporations to exploit the resources and leave our lands contaminated and depleted despite our inherent rights. We are not nearly as compensated for our Territories where multinational corporations and the province benefit more in flawed agreements. 


PROVINCIAL LANDS ARE REALLY FEDERAL LANDS


The British North America Act, 1867/ The Constitution Act 1867

The Myth: Section 109 says the land and natural resources inside a province belong to that provinces not Ottawa unless those lands were already federally owned at Confederation.


Factual Emphasis: The four British colonies; Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, Upper Canada and Lower Canada did not become free, sovereign provinces nor did any lands become their through the 1867 BNA Act. The provinces were only colonies before and after the creation of the Dominion of Canada. The 1867 BNA Act was only a consolidation of these colonies the become one unit called a Dominion. A Dominion was still the possession of lands belonging to the UK Crown in Chancery. The 1867 BNA created no Federal Government and Confederation of independent provinces. The Dominion of Canada was still a colony of the UK.


The British North America Act, 1930 - Enactment No. 16

The Myth: The British North America Act, 1930 was a constitutional amendment that gave the Prairie provinces and BC the same control over their natural resources as the original provinces of Confederation (like Ontario) had enjoyed since 1867. 


Transfer of Public Lands Generally.

1. In order that the Province may be in the same position as the original Provinces of Confederation are in virtue of section one hundred and nine of the British North America Act, 1867, the interest of the Crown in all Crown lands, mines, minerals (precious and base) and royalties derived therefrom within the Province, and all sums due or payable for such lands, mines, minerals or royalties, shall, from and after the coming into force of this agreement,


Factual Emphasis: Queen Victoria, Her Heirs and Successors in Sec 2 of the BNA Act were the enacting clause, the executive power. The UK 1893 Statue Revision Act removed Sec 2 of BNA Act; When Queen Victoria died in 1901 so did the BNA Act which no longer could be amended or reenacted. The UK held Imperial Conferences over 30 years with its Dominions regarding how to deal with this and created the 1931 Statue of Westminister. This Statue allowed the Dominions to become their own free Independent States no longer attached to the UK. The Politicians of the Dominion of Canada saw this and didn’t want the hand over the power and the lands to the provinces and deceptively and unlawfully amended The British North America Act, to create these Natural Resources Transfer Act. This put all lands of the provinces in the hands of the so called assumed Federal Government. 


Provincial Lands just like Reserve Lands under the deception that is Canada are Federal Lands.


WHAT FIRST NATION LAND CODES ACTUALLY DO

The First Nations Land Management (FNLM) Act enables First Nations to opt out of 44 sections of the Indian Act related to land and environmental management. The Framework Agreement on First Nations Land Management lets First Nations run their own land affairs without federal interference. It replaces pieces of the Indian Act and gives communities the power to make their own land laws, manage their resources, and speed up development, all through a community-approved Land Code.


Yellowhead Institute is an Indigenous-led research and education centre based in the Faculty of Arts at Toronto Metropolitan University. The Institute published a special report in 2019 titled, The Rise of the First Nations Land Management Regime in Canada: A Critical Analysis


The report shares this on the FNLMA Regime:

  • Positive: FNLMA gives real, tangible land-management power to First Nations; it has economic promise; and it builds local governance.

  • Critical: But it is not a full decolonization or self-government solution. It risks commodifying land, shifts burdens to First Nations, and doesn’t address broader issues of Indigenous land title beyond reserves.


Yellowhead ultimately sees the regime as a double-edged sword: a pragmatic tool for greater self-determination, but one embedded in settler-colonial structures and market logic.


Russell Diabo a Mohawk from Kanawake is a First Nations policy analyst, and has history of resistance and decades of advocacy for Indigenous Sovereignty. He published First Nations Bulletin and has been sharing his critical analysis on the FNLMA Regime.


According to Diabo, land codes: give delegated powers (not sovereign powers); limit governance to reserve boundaries; create land-use and permitting regimes similar to municipalities; shift First Nations toward administrative service delivery; maintain the Crown’s underlying title and control fit into a policy agenda that treats First Nations as “local governments.” He argues that land codes transform First Nations into municipal-type bodies rather than sovereign nations.


AN EXTINGUISHMENT OF INHERENT RIGHTS AND TITLE


The UK 1893 Statute Law Revision Act removed Sec 2, the Monarch and all Heirs and Successors from the BNA Act, 1901 after Queen died, so did the BNA and Indian Act which could never be reenacted of amended. The UK 1931 Statute of Westminster allowed the UK’s Dominions to become Sovereign Nations free of the UK. Queen Elizabeth and UK enacted the 1982 Canada Act but all Provinces needed sign Schedule B and make 3 Proclamations this did not happen also this act amended the BNA Act into the Constitution Acts 1867/1982 which the UK had not authority, legal right to do as per 1893 Statute Revision Act and 1932 Statute of Westminster.


The Charter of Rights and Freedoms is an illegal, unlawful enactment created by a foreign monach and government for a free independent People. Section 35 defines an “Indian” under the Indian Act as a legal person, a corporation. The Indian Act is a dead act. It is only the Indigenous Peoples who are choosing to illegally and unlawfully be subjugated by it by the Corporation called Canada.


Indigenous Rights under Sec 35. Inuit, Metis, Indians and Non-Status Indians are legal persons, a corporation under Sec 35. A legal person, corporation is not a human being but artificial person and can not have inherent fundamental rights and freedoms. The precedent Case Law that defines Indigenous Rights in common-law within the corporation of Canada is St.Catharines Milling and Lumber Company v R 1888 brought the Doctrine of Discovery into the corporation, Canada; This held that Indigenous title is subject to Canada and Canada has jurisdiction over Indians and all lands.  


So asserting Sec 35 Rights and Canada’s Framework Agreement on First Nations Lands Management is an extinguishment of inherent rights and title to our Territories to become “civilized”, the legal person in civil jurisdiction. It is also an act of Fraud legitimizing the fraudulent legal existence of Canada and its Provinces. 



MY FIGHT WITH THE FRAMEWORK AGREEMENT AND LAND CODE 


Above: One of a collective of heavy equipment that were using my property as a parking lot and space to do Hydro work. I have no issue with needed work to be done only the mechanism it is being done by. A Sacred Fire was ran over by these vehicles. Grandmothers rose and lilac bushed destroyed, removed, ruts created, dirt and lawn uprooted. No Consultation or Consent. Band and Hydro used a defective invalid easement.
Above: One of a collective of heavy equipment that were using my property as a parking lot and space to do Hydro work. I have no issue with needed work to be done only the mechanism it is being done by. A Sacred Fire was ran over by these vehicles. Grandmothers rose and lilac bushed destroyed, removed, ruts created, dirt and lawn uprooted. No Consultation or Consent. Band and Hydro used a defective invalid easement.


Canada’s Beausoleil First Nation’s Indian Act Band Council administers services and programs in my community of Gchmnissing Anishinabek. The Band Council signed on to the Framework Agreement in 2012 and ratified a Land Code in 2019. 


To summarize this matter, I filed a Federal Human Rights Complaint on Canada, Beausoleil First Nation and Hydro One. There is no Easements in the Land Code that was adopted. The Band and Hydro One have been using a defective, invalid Easement permitted by Indian Affairs in 1955. Hydro one damaged my families vacant property and parked vehicles for a week on and off work hours without informing and getting consent. The Band Land’s Department replied to my initial complaint by informing me that any interest or licence in Beausoleil First Nation land that existed when the Land Code took effect will continue in force in accordance to the terms and conditions. 

Above: Indigenous Services Abstract and a Minutes of a Meeting of Privy COuncil 1955. The BFN Band Council in 1955 only allowed an Easement for the Common Lands and notindividual CP Plots of the Reserve but Indian Affairs ignored them and surrendered the whole of the reserve for Hydro to use.
Above: Indigenous Services Abstract and a Minutes of a Meeting of Privy COuncil 1955. The BFN Band Council in 1955 only allowed an Easement for the Common Lands and notindividual CP Plots of the Reserve but Indian Affairs ignored them and surrendered the whole of the reserve for Hydro to use.

I am using the Canada’s own laws against itself in this matter and am using specifically Coldwater Indian Band v. Canada (Indian and Northern Affairs), 2017 and Cowichan Tribes v. Canada (Attorney General), 2025 held that the Crown must reassess the continued legitimacy or fairness of agreements entered into decades earlier, such as a 1957 pipeline easement. affirms that Aboriginal title predates Crown grants: The court found that certain fee simple interests granted by the province, which could include easements, were constitutionally defective and invalid because they unjustifiably infringed on Aboriginal title and Canada owes the duty to Free Prior and Informed Consent.


For more on my matter and the legal arguments and path I use that may help you your fight against a Band Council follow the link:


The main point I wanted to share in this matter is the Ratification Threshold to enact these Land Codes on Community and as it pertains to Indigenous Title violates Canada's own laws. 


THE DOUBLE STANDARD 

Canada recognizes and holds by Supreme Court of Canada decisions in Delgamuukw v. British Columbia (1997), Tsilhqot’in Nation v. British Columbia (2014) where the Courts explicitly state that Aboriginal title “cannot be held by individual Aboriginal persons,” because it is a communal interest of the group.


Canada’s Framework Agreement on First Nations Lands Management in section 7.4 (a) That a Council may establish establish a percentage of eligible voters who must participate in the vote in order for the result to be binding; (25% plus 1 of eligible voters to ratify agreement)


 (b) require that a percentage greater than fifty percent of participating eligible voters must vote to approve the land code and individual agreement in order to obtain community approval.


The Beausoleil Band Council choose option 7.4 (a) along with many other Band Councils 25% plus one of edible voters to accept the agreement and pass a land code. 


A First Nation can hold a second vote, or subsequent votes, on matters under the Framework Agreement on First Nation Land Management (FNLM), particularly if the required approval threshold was not met in the initial vote. The specific procedures for such votes are outlined in the Community Approval Process (CAP) developed by each First Nation as part of its unique Land Code. 


FNLMA/FAFLM/LAND CODES, are only enacted by a small minority of Individuals of "Indians" in approved by Canada thresholds which is in violation of Anishinabek Law. Anishinabek law is community Consenus. Graphic by Gord Hill (Zigzag) Warrior Publication. Gord Hill is of the Kwakwaka'wakw nation.
FNLMA/FAFLM/LAND CODES, are only enacted by a small minority of Individuals of "Indians" in approved by Canada thresholds which is in violation of Anishinabek Law. Anishinabek law is community Consenus. Graphic by Gord Hill (Zigzag) Warrior Publication. Gord Hill is of the Kwakwaka'wakw nation.

So Canada recognizes that Indigenous Title is held by the Collective and can’t be held by an individual or individuals however Canada also recognizes through this Lands Regime that Indigenous Title is also held not by the collective but a minority of individuals.


This is laughable as the Beausoleil First Nations Lands Department informed me when I raised concerns about the damage of my property and seeking compensation that I am only an individual minority, 1/3 of the property Certificate of Possession holder to my Family Lands. By their standards I am 25% plus one my two Aunts never participated in raising concerns so what I say is the law. The Irony is ironic.


Does the First Nations Lands Management Act, Framework Agreement on First Nations Lands Management and Band’s Land Codes turn reserves into Municipalities and Fee Simple Lands and under the jurisdiction of the Province? It does a lot more then that. This is another Agreements like Settlement Agreements and Self Government Agreements and Sec 35 Rights that extinguish Indigenous Title and Inherent Rights acknowledging Canada has ultimate title and jurisdiction over Indians. This Agreement does not take you out of the 44 Section of the Indian Act regarding land but puts you back in the Indian Act as it is a dead enactment since 1901. 


Canada is not extinguishing our Title and Rights, Indians are who are legitimizing our Genocide through accepting Payouts, Settlements and these agreements.  

 
 
 

By Kaikaikons, Atik Clan

Johnny Hawk


First Things First: Who Are You Dealing With?


“His Majesty in Right of Canada”, “The Crown”, “The Federal Government of Canada” or what is called “Canada” is not a land mass, a confederation of provinces or a government.


There exists no constitution nor did the so called citizens of the provinces ever seat a lawful and legal dejure Federal government. Canada has no legal title to any lands. Canada is only a corporation and only has jurisdiction upon the waters. This is all legal fact by the following Statutes:  


British North America Act, 1867 

Enacting Clause: Section 2. "The Provisions of this Act referring to Her Majesty the Queen extend also to the Heirs and Successors of Her Majesty, Kings and Queens of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland."


This enacting clause was the monarchy and all heirs and successors and is what gave this Act life. 


The U.K’s 1893 Statute Law Revision Act:

“Whereas that certain enactments have ceased to be in force, namely, Section Two. Provisions of this Act referring to Her Majesty the Queen extend also to the Heirs and Successors of Her Majesty.” 


This Act removed the enacting clause of the 1867 BNA Act. When Queen Victoria died so did the 1867 BNA Act including all provisions in it including the Indian Act. This did not remove the monarchy or the succession of the Crown for the Dominion but only meant that the heirs and successors of the monarchy could not reenact or amend the BNA Act and Indian Act. 


The Indian Act:                                                                                                                    


Section 2 (1) Definitions; In this Act, band means; a body of Indians for whose use and benefit in common, lands, the legal title to which is vested in Her Majesty, have been set apart before, on or after September 4, 1951. 


The date September 4, 1951 was when amendments were made to the Indian Act. King George VI was still King before, on and after September 4 1951 and died on February 6, 1952. The Proclamation of Elizabeth II as Queen was on February 6, 1952 and the Coronation of Queen Elizabeth II was on June 2, 1953. 


The Queen they are referring to in this enacting clause of the Indian Act refers to Queen Victoria because the enacting clause can not be changed; Today it still says Her Majesty when there clearly is a King. This is a dead act and can not be reenacted or amended as per the 1893 Statute Revision Act. 


1931 Statute of Westminster:                                                                                                  Section 2 Removed Colonial Law from the Dominion of Canada, Section 7 is misleading; Subsection 7 (1) attempts to exclude the BNA Act from this statute however, the BNA Act was only a guide to aid the Governor General. It could only be effective if there is a duly appointed Governor General. (See Section 12 of the BNA Act 1867) Since the Crown in Chancery who appoints the Governor General gave up allodial title to the lands thanks to

Section 11, there can be no more Governor General, Result this subsection is redundant. 


Left to Right: Prime Minister of Canada, Justin Trudeau, Pope Francis, First Indigenous Person to sit as a Governor General, Mary Simon. 2022. The 1947 Letters Patent for Office of Governor General was a forgery by PM William Lyon McKenzie as Canada was free of the UK and no longer needs a GG. Mary Simon is committing fraud.
Left to Right: Prime Minister of Canada, Justin Trudeau, Pope Francis, First Indigenous Person to sit as a Governor General, Mary Simon. 2022. The 1947 Letters Patent for Office of Governor General was a forgery by PM William Lyon McKenzie as Canada was free of the UK and no longer needs a GG. Mary Simon is committing fraud.

Section 11 severed the connection between the Dominion and Great Britain. The Provinces were not joined as one colony of Great Britain any longer. 


All lands obtained by the Crown in Chancery in Treaties with the Indigenous Nations reverted back to the allodial title to the Indigenous Nations. The Indigenous Nations have no Treaties with the Provinces and Canada nor consented for them to be successors in Treaties. No Province has ever held a constitutional convention. No Province has seated a dejure lawful government.


The Statute ended all Treaties where all lands obtained and held by the Crown in Chancery reverted back to the original title holders, The Indigenous Nations. NOT Indian Act Bands nor Band Councils or “Indians.”


The UK’s Canada Act, 1982:       

The Royal Proclamation, 1982: ”provides that the Constitution Act, 1982, shall, subject to section 59 thereof, come into force on a date to be fixed by proclamation.”  


This “subject to section 59” means two proclamations must be made before the final proclamation to pass the act could be made (section 58) This was only the Queen stating that there will be a proclamation in the future. Nothing was passed. Nothing was enacted.   

 

The signing of the Royal Proclamation, 1982, on April 17, 1982. The Grand Illusion.
The signing of the Royal Proclamation, 1982, on April 17, 1982. The Grand Illusion.

                                                                         

All Provinces needed to sign Schedule B of the Act. Quebec needed to authorize a Proclamation to enact Section 23, (1) (a) of the Act. Section 23, (1a) would be enacted through a proclamation. Section 59 (3) would be enacted by a proclamation to repeal Section 59 and renumbered the Act. Section 58 would be enacted through a proclamation to pass the Act. 


A total of 3 Proclamations were needed to pass the Act. None of this happened. The Constitution Act, 1982 is only an incorporation document for a corporation. Canada is only a Corporation no different then Walmart or McDonalds. 



Canada's Interpretation Act 1985 General definitions 35 (1):                                                    “In every enactment, Canada, for greater certainty, includes the internal waters of Canada and the territorial sea of Canada; Canadian waters includes the territorial sea of Canada and the internal waters of Canada” 


The legal rule for the word “includes” is defined in Blacks Law Dictionary Sixth Edition under “Expressio unius set exclusion alteriuis” which says, “where a statute, contract or other legal document includes a list of items falling into a category, the inclusion of certain items on that list should be presumed to mean that any excluded items are intentionally outside the definition.”


WHAT IS CANADA?


Canada is not a landmass or a federal government. Canada is only the "law of water” known as maritime law, which is the body of law that governs activities on the sea and other navigable waters such as shipping and trade. Canada is only a  Shipping and Trading Corporation, stealing our natural resources and creating debt slaves upon its ship.


All those who operate life through the Birth Certificate and SIN CARD and Indian Status as citizens of Canada are employers and officers of this ship called Canada. 


Centre: Canada's Attorney General/Minsiter of Justice, Judy Wilson-Raybould and PM Justin Trudeau 2015. Raybould was the first Indigenous Person to hold these position. Despite her role as top Lawyer in Canada, Indigenous Nations "Charter protected Rights" were violated in decisions in the Supreme Court.
Centre: Canada's Attorney General/Minsiter of Justice, Judy Wilson-Raybould and PM Justin Trudeau 2015. Raybould was the first Indigenous Person to hold these position. Despite her role as top Lawyer in Canada, Indigenous Nations "Charter protected Rights" were violated in decisions in the Supreme Court.

WHAT IS A CHARTER?


Charter; reservation of a ship; or written grant, by which a corporation is founded and its rights privileges are defined. A ship needs to be chartered to land.


The legal definition of a Person; an artificial person, a corporation. 


Through the “person” = ALL CAPS name on all forms, ID’s, licenses, Indian Status registration card, passports, birth certificates, etc you have submitted yourself to operate within maritime law. You have only privileges that the corporation grants to you. Those do not include unalienable rights, inherent fundamental rights and freedoms.  


INDIGENOUS RIGHTS UNDER UNDRIP AND CANADA’S CHARTER


“Indigenous Rights” under the United Nations Declaration of Indigenous Peoples and Canada’s Charter of Rights Section 35 is under International law which takes the Indigenous National out of the jurisdiction of our “law of land” to be ruled over by those whose law this is that operates the world under "the law of water". 


BOOKOF REVELATIONS 17:1

"One of the seven angels who had the seven bowls came and said to me, “Come, I will show you the punishment of the great prostitute, who sits by many waters."


PRECEDENT CASE LAW

Canadian Indigenous law is primarily shaped by section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982, which recognizes and affirms existing Aboriginal and Treaty rights.


St. Catharines Milling and Lumber Co. v. R, (1887)

This Case introduced the Doctrine of Discovery into Canadian Law. The ruling held that Indigenous peoples held only a “personal and usufructuary right” to their lands—meaning a limited right of occupation—while the underlying title belonged to the Crown by virtue of 

“discovery.”


Section 35 Rights:

Despite charter protected rights in Section 35 for Indians, Canada can do as it pleases and ignore, infringe upon Sec 35 in regards to land as Canada has the underlying title as per St. Catharines Milling and Lumber Co. v. R.


Section 35 turned the term "Indian" into the legal person, a corporation. An entity under Civil law and or Maritime Law.


WHAT IS A LAWYER? 


All Courts are administering the Roman Catholic Church’s Sacrament of Penance aka Confession. Another deep history I've shared in another publication. The Private Bar Guilds have monetized Indulgences and created a monopoly off of Sin.


The latin term “pro se” means “for oneself” and “cutis” means “true skin” which is in reference to “representing one’s own flesh.” A person who is claiming to be you in making the “self accusation” is the Prosecutor.


The Courts are conducting commerce just as a Bank. Law dictionaries define a Bank also as; A bench or seat; the bench or tribunal occupied by the judges; the seat of judgment; a court.


Left: David Nahwegabow, the Founding Partner of the Law Firm, Nahwegabow-Corbiere. Right: Dianne Corbiere is the Managing Partner of the Firm. The Firm represented the 21 Indian Act Bands in the Robinson Huron Treaty annuities case, which resulted in a $10 billion settlement.  The legal team from Nahwegahbow Corbiere claimed $510 million in fees under a partial contingency agreement. Under their agreement, they billed at 50% of normal hourly rates, plus a contingent success fee (15% on first $100 M, 5% above) with no cap. At least two Bands filed court applications asking the court to review and reduce the $510 M fee. Ontario Superior Court Justice Fred Myers ruled that the $510 M was unreasonable. The judge ordered Nahwegahbow Corbiere to refund $232 million of what they’d been paid to the Robinson‑Huron Treaty Litigation Fund. He awarded a revised total of about $40 million to the legal team.  On behalf of their clients, Nahwegahbow Corbiere, Brian Gover of Stockwoods Barristers said an appeal was being contemplated, calling the judges decision ‘offensive’ and ‘paternalistic’
Left: David Nahwegabow, the Founding Partner of the Law Firm, Nahwegabow-Corbiere. Right: Dianne Corbiere is the Managing Partner of the Firm. The Firm represented the 21 Indian Act Bands in the Robinson Huron Treaty annuities case, which resulted in a $10 billion settlement. The legal team from Nahwegahbow Corbiere claimed $510 million in fees under a partial contingency agreement. Under their agreement, they billed at 50% of normal hourly rates, plus a contingent success fee (15% on first $100 M, 5% above) with no cap. At least two Bands filed court applications asking the court to review and reduce the $510 M fee. Ontario Superior Court Justice Fred Myers ruled that the $510 M was unreasonable. The judge ordered Nahwegahbow Corbiere to refund $232 million of what they’d been paid to the Robinson‑Huron Treaty Litigation Fund. He awarded a revised total of about $40 million to the legal team. On behalf of their clients, Nahwegahbow Corbiere, Brian Gover of Stockwoods Barristers said an appeal was being contemplated, calling the judges decision ‘offensive’ and ‘paternalistic’

Lawyer: The word lawyer is from the late 16th Century combining the latin words “lar/ lares” which means “customary law” and “iuro/iurare” which means to “take an oath” or “to conspire”meaning “one who has sworn an oath to customary law.”


The Private BAR Guilds since the middle ages have been using merchant principles to commercialize the law and personally profit from crime; This means that the current justice system is innately compromised as everything is in favour to benefit these Private BAR Guilds; Therefore no lawyer can’t be counsel without deliberately injuring the law and perverting the course of Justice


WHAT IS MONEY?


This is a topic of its own and is included in a zine in relation to our rights in a publication that can be found at https://www.anishinaabek.com/_files/ugd/9156a9_1b3fe356ebbe4976ab3b975a5e34430e.pdf but here is a summery.  


Almost every government around the World is made to be dependent on the International Banking Scheme of debt based, fiat money system and fractional reserve banking system. Governments give up their constitutional obligation of creating money themselves and hand it over their Central Banks to the International Private Banking Syndicate. 


These International Private Banks lend their debt based “chequebook” money (counterfeit) created by entering digits on a computer and transferring it to a Government with outrageous compound interest attached which realistically can never be paid back. In this Fiat Money System this form of “money” is not backed by a commodity like gold or sliver. This “Money” only discharges debt, it is authorized by a Government that can be spent all over the Nation, it is declared legal tender for all debts private and public and the limited liability is that you cannot be sued for not paying your debts (bills and purchases, loans etc). We “discharge” the “charge” using this colourable money (counterfeit).  We are only passing around debt. At any moment they can crash this system and the money in the banks wouldn’t be worth anything and whereas it is backed by nothing.


The Fraser Institute, an independent, non-partisan Canadian public policy think-tank in a 2016 study called, The Cost of Government Debt in Canada, found that Canadian governments (federal, provincial and local) spent ($160 Million Daily) or $60 Billion Annually towards this debt. 


According to Natural Resources Canada, governments (federal + provincial) derived about CA$ 14.8 billion per year on average from 2016–2020 from the natural resource sector.


This means the “money” being used to compensate “Indians” in these Settlements and Agreements is debt and interest and "Indian" consent for Canada to exploit resources and labour where the wealth is funnelled to these International Private Banks.


The Indian Land Management Fund (Indian Trust Fund) came into existence on April 1, 1858. It is an account to hold all “monies” collected, received, or held by the Crown for the “use and benefit” of its Indigenous Allies. These monies come from the sale or lease of lands and from royalties and revenues from natural resources. This Trust became aggressively mismanaged and eventually expropriated where it now exists today within the Consolidated Revenue Fund of Canada — the general account where all public moneys are deposited. 


Money and Wealth are two different things. The wealth that exists in the Consolidated Revenue Fund belongs to Indigenous Nationals. This wealth is also not to be confused with this counterfeit money that is being distributed in Settlements and funding for Indian Reserves. All that is transferred to Indians and Indian Reserves is debt and interest on this debt in the form of this colorable money “debt notes.” 


And now Indians are fighting over it with the Band Councils and lawyers. The "Whiteman" must be laughing hard.


OVERLAPPING TREATIES



An estimated 1/3 of The Robinson Huron Treaty surrendered lands of other Anishinabek. In 1850 Clan Chiefs of the Chippewa Tri Council of Lakes Huron and Simcoe, Chiefs Aisance, Snake and Yellowhead, two weeks after the signing of the Robinson Huron Treaty met with Government Officials to raise concerns of this. The Government Official promised to deal with the matter but did not.


Throughout the 1800's many settlers began taking up these lands and In 1931 the Crown made the 1931 Williams Treaties with 7 Bands; Scugog, Hiawatha, Alderville, Curve Lake, Rama, Georgina Island and Beausoleil. The Treaty included payment of $2 to each Indian. The Crown also fraudulently extinguished Hunting/Fishing/Harvesting Rights of these Indian Bands on this vast Territory.


In the 2018 Williams Treaties the 7 Bands were given $1.2 Billion for this historic injustice of being underpaid and having rights fraudulently extinguished where they were criminalized for Hunting and harvesting for over 100 years. This Settlement DID not include any mention of Annuities that were to be part of every treaty via the 1764 Niagara Covenant Chain Belt. No Band Council or Lawyer of either Treaty raise the issue to their People of how Robinson Huron "Indians" have been accepting and awarded retropayment for in annuities for Williams Treaties lands.


Treaties have divided our Peoples. Even though Treaties have been extinguished in 1931 and it is all our lands, Canada is using Treaties to keep us under the illusion of Treaty Relationship to legitimize its existence.


SETTLEMENTS ARE SURRENDERS


“Band Councils” and “Indians” accepting Settlement Agreements are giving legitimacy to Canada and the Provinces which are not legal and lawful governments.


Accepting these Agreements under Sec 35 is accepting the Doctrine of Discovery.


Accepting monies for compensation in these Settlement and Agreements is accepting  counterfeit money (debt notes) from the International Banks where the compound interest owed by the Corporation of Canada allows for the never ending pillaging of our territories for resource wealth that leave our lands decimated and people poisoned and impoverished and the so called Canadian tax payer an economic debt slave.


Accepting these Agreement Settlements is a death sentence to future generations and the land because of this monstrosity of debt we are being fooled into accepting as compensation where people see it as “money” and while lawyers of Band Councils become millionaires and sworn to their Oaths of the Private guilds of the BAR they belong to.


These Settlements are Extinguishment Agreements.  


THERE IS STILL AN OPTION OF RESISTANCE


Canada can only operate in maritime law, international law and this is why they had to include Sec 35 in the Charter, to take the Indigenous National out of their Law of the Land (Tribal Custom Law) and become the legal person so they can deal in commerce, trade and have jurisdiction over Indians.


Above: 21 (Band Chiefs) Officers of the Indian Act, Canada Incorporated, committing fraud and treason to their Ancestors and Future Generation over debt notes, counterfeit money. Extinguishing Title and Rights acknowledging Canada has rule over them and all lands.
Above: 21 (Band Chiefs) Officers of the Indian Act, Canada Incorporated, committing fraud and treason to their Ancestors and Future Generation over debt notes, counterfeit money. Extinguishing Title and Rights acknowledging Canada has rule over them and all lands.

An Indian Act Band Council is designated as a “federal boards” via the Federal Courts Act, Section 2 (1) as Band Councils are created by and derive their authority exclusively from the federal Indian Act. 


In Willson v. British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority the court held that an Indian Act Band is a juridical person, meaning; a corporation. 


An “Indian” under the Indian Act is defined as the legal person; a statutory creature, a corporation. “Indians”, “Indian Bands”, “Band Councils” are statutory creations and do not have inherent rights and freedoms and are not the legal and lawful Rights holders of Anishinabek lands nor have title to any lands. 


Canada only dealing with Indian Act Band Councils by doing so is only dealing with itself. All matters between Canada and Indian Act “Band Councils” regarding rights and lands of Anishinabek Peoples is illegal. The Indian Act was repealed in 1901 and is void including Band Councils.


It is up to the individual to get of the ship and out of the waters and come back to land to as a Sovereign Anishinabek. This means resisting living life through the birth certificate, SIN Card, and as an INDIAN, a legal person with drivers licences and all other permits and ID’s in civil jurisdiction.  


These Settlements are null and void and can be challenge if you stand under the proper law. 

We must remove ourselves from the position as an Indian and Indian Bands, and Band Councils that are only legitimate on a ship on water and have no title to our Lands nor does Canada. 


Check out ACTION - Anishinaabek Clans to Invoke our Nation www.anishinaabek.com where we are organizing as such.  It is time to rekindle our Clan Council Fires and can only be done outside of being the legal person and status Indian.




 
 
 
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Thanks for submitting!

CONTACT >

Anishinabek Clans to Invoke our Nation      81 Ogema Miikaan

Christian Island Indian Reserve No. 30a, Tiny, ON, Canada

T: 705 247 2120

C: 705 247 2120

E: communications@anishinaabek.net 

© 2023 by Make A Change.
Proudly created with Wix.com

bottom of page