top of page

NEWS

Editorials and Press Releases

Search
A Band Member being denied entry to a Band Meeting at the Goodfish Lake Indian Reserve in northern Alberta

By Johnny Hawk


As a Band Member we are Beneficiaries of the Indian Trust Fund where Funds are given by Canada to Band Council and their Administration to administer. A Band Council and their Administration are Trustee’s to this Trust. The Indian Monies of a Band are a Trust.

A Trustee has the duty to provide information to beneficiaries arising from the trustee’s fiduciary obligation to account to the beneficiary of the trust property. Each Province has a Trust Act that state this obligation. As Trustees they organize Band Meetings to give such information to Beneficiaries.


Your right to attend a Band Meeting is protected by the freedom of peaceful assembly under Section 2(c) of the [Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms]which protects your right to gather physically with others in a peaceful manner, such as for protests, demonstrations, parades, and general meetings. This right includes the freedom to participate in peaceful assemblies in public spaces, though it is not absolute and can be subject to reasonable limits imposed by law if the government has a compelling reason to do so.


A Band Member further has a Charter Protected and Affirmed Right to attend a Band Meeting through the Right of Freedom of Expression. Freedom of expression, a fundamental freedom under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, is the right to express beliefs, thoughts, ideas, and emotions; to share information; and to seek and receive information and ideas without restriction.


In 2011 The Supreme Court of Canada in Canada (Information Commissioner) v. Canada (Minister of Defence) states Access to government information is vital to a vibrant democracy. It enables Canadians to participate in civic activities in an informed way. It also ensures transparency and accountability across government institutions.


The Supreme Court of Canada has affirmed a fundamental, implied right to access government information, stating it is essential for citizens to participate in democracy and hold government accountable. This right underpins the [Canadian Access to Information and is a critical component of a transparent and responsive government. Access to such information enables the public to form informed opinions, participate in public discourse, and ensure that public institutions operate in the public interest.


The United Nations, Declaration on the Right and Responsibility of Individuals, Groups and Organs of Society to Promote and Protect Universally Recognized Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms:


  • Everyone has the right, individually and in association with others:


  • To know, seek, obtain, receive and hold information about all human rights and fundamental freedoms, including having access to information as to how those rights and freedoms are given effect in domestic legislative, judicial or administrative systems;


  • As provided for in human rights and other applicable international instruments, freely to publish, impart or disseminate to others views, information and knowledge on all human rights and fundamental freedoms;


  • To study, discuss, form and hold opinions on the observance, both in law and in practice, of all human rights and fundamental freedoms and, through these and other appropriate means, to draw public attention to those matters.


A Band Council and or its Administration’s refusal to allow a Band Member to attend a Community Meeting is denial of an individuals right to freedom of assembly and right to freedom of expression based on the grounds of discrimination of the individuals race, ancestry, ethnic origin.


 A Band Council and its Administration is using their authority through the Indian Act which is a racially discriminative enactment that governs all aspects of Indigenous Peoples. Based on their race and ancestry and ethnic origin. Such Elected Councils of a Band and its Administration are using their status and position through the Indian Act to deny the individuals right to assembly and freedom of expression to attend a Meeting where the Individual is a beneficiary and has a right to attend such meeting for information that involves their trust.


This individual needs to take this Band and Police Service and file a complaint with Canada’s Human Rights Tribunal.


 
 
 

GO FUND ME LINK


To help with legal costs where Johnny Hawke from Beausoleil First Nation is filling a unique Constitutional Question using Indigenous Rights to repeal Bill c5 and Bill 5 and to stop Doug Fords proposed changes to the Provincial Parks and Conservation Act to sell 60% of Wasaga Beach Provincial Park for development and the amendments to Ontario Water Resources Act that will allow corporations to heavily extract and exploit Water Sources in Ontario for profit. and privatization.


Hawke intends to use strong arguments including an outstanding land claim issue to save the Beach for everyone's use. The Constitutional Challenge is more stronger then the one 7 First Nations filed in July.


Hawke also is seeking to raise funds to set up Awareness Campaign's on the issues such as BBQ/Music Rallies in the area and Occupation and Land Back Encampments.


Johnny has been successful in 2009 where he led a blockade to stop DUMP SITE 41 in Elmvale, the multimillion dollar construction of a state of the art dumpsite to protect the Aliston Aquifier. Hawke has also been successful in using his specific arguments self representing himself in 2020 and 2022 in protests of land occupations and rights.


Please consider a donation or share with some folks who can like NGO's and Enviro Organizations that have funding for things like this and to who claim to show Indigenous Solidarity Support. This is as real as it gets in this campaign. Indian Act Bands Challenges can'ts peak for inherent rights in legal arena as they are under civil jurisdiction.


To see the Constitutional Challenge document click below


 
 
 

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE


GCHIMNISSING ANISHINABEK TERRITORY (Christian Island, ON) - A local Indigenous Rights Activist is filing a unique Constitutional Question challenging the newly passed Federal and Ontario's economic laws along with proposed changes to the Provincial Parks and Conservation Act claiming they violate his fundamental rights and freedoms to Indigenous Lands.


Johnny Hawke a member of Gchimnissing Anishinabek (Beausoleil First Nation) on Christian Island says the enactments allow the compromising of the environmental integrity to his Peoples Territories which violates his inherent Indigenous Rights.


"These enactments permit the ongoing environmental racism and ecocide to Indigenous Lands which is an abridgement of my right to life, liberty, security of the person and freedom of association in relation to my inherent rights to my Clan and Family Territories." says Hawke.


The newly passed laws are intended to fast-track infrastructure projects where Bill C-5 allows the federal cabinet to quickly approve big projects deemed to be in the national interest. They include mines, ports and pipelines. Ontario's bill allows its cabinet to suspend provincial and municipal laws in "special economic zones." In his challenge Hawke also includes Ontario's proposed amendments to the Provincial Parks and Conservation Reserves Act.


"The Province wants to sell 60% of Wasaga Beach Provincial Park to the Town of Wasaga Beach to develop. These lands are part of 1.6 Million Acres of the 1818 Lakes Simcoe-Notawasaga Treaty 18 between the Chippewa Tri Council and Britain where the land was improperly surrendered with no proper compensation. If the Province wants to start surrendering Provincial Parks it should first return it back to the lawful rights holders. Their actions might cost them more then want is intended." says Hawke.


Hawke has prepared what he calls a unique constitutional question that challenges not only the contentious economic enactments but the 1897 and 1982 Constitution Acts itself.


"The laws I am challenging were enacted under the UK's 1982 Canada Act which unlawfully amended the dead 1867 British North America Act. The UK legally could not enact or amend anything for Canadians where today these acts exist unlawfully under an illegitimate government and constitution act. Canada has an outstanding Constitutional matter to take care of first before exploiting any more of our lands" says Hawke


Although Hawke is challenging the very foundation of Canada and its laws he recognizes the complexity of his Constitutional Question he states he is using unique steps using the appropriate laws and jurisdiction to find a remedy in the matter he is presenting.


"Canada's Interpretation Act states Canada's legal tradition is both of Common Law and Civil Law. There are laws we must show the court to walk ourselves out of the designation of the legal person tied to civil jurisdiction and step into the common law jurisdiction where human being's fundamental rights and freedoms veto civil enactments." claims Hawke


"Only the self representing individual can use this pathway as using a lawyer or an attorney you give up your rights and become the legal person which has no Human Rights but only civil rights under civil jurisdiction." says Hawke.


Earlier this Summer in July, Nine First Nations filed a Constitutional Challenge over the same Bills seeking a court ordered injunction to prevent the federal and provincial governments to fast-track infrastructure projects.


The First Nations argue both pieces of legislation authorize "the Crown to unilaterally ram through projects without meaningful or any engagement with First Nations and "violate the constitutional obligation of the Crown to advance ... reconciliation."


In his document Hawke states that First Nation Elected Councils are enacted by Canada's Indian Act are not the legitimate representatives of Indigenous Nations, and suggests their legal challenge may be unsuccessful.


" Indian Act Band Councils are restricted to civil jurisdiction. The Indian Act states Indian Lands are of the legal title of the Crown. Indigenous Territories are not Reserves or Indian Lands and Indian Act elected councils have no legal right to negotiation, surrender or make any agreements regarding Indigenous Territories. Indian Act Elected Councils are only an extension of the Federal Government as Officers of the Indian Act" says Hawke.


Hawke intends to see his challenge make it to the Supreme Court of Canada.


" I am filing through the lower courts first and if unsuccessful will file for a leave to appeal and take the appropriate steps to the higher court. This is a very unique challenge and believe the arguments and case law in particular have never been used in Canada before. Canadians need to heed attention to this legal history lesson." says Hawke


Hawke self represented himself filing two constitutional challenges regarding charges laid on him for blockades he led in 2019 and 2022 over occupied Indigenous lands. The Crown wanted to pursue charges at the time where Hawke was on Probation but after filing his challenge the crown withdrew charges.


Below is his current constitutional challenge.



If you'd like to be an ally, support and work on this collective campaign contact communications@anishinaabek.net and or 705 247 2120






 
 
 
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Thanks for submitting!

CONTACT >

Anishinabek Clans to Invoke our Nation      81 Ogema Miikaan

Christian Island Indian Reserve No. 30a, Tiny, ON, Canada

T: 705 247 2120

C: 705 247 2120

E: communications@anishinaabek.net 

© 2023 by Make A Change.
Proudly created with Wix.com

bottom of page